"We’re confident Ohio voters will see Issue 1 for the scam that it is: a corrupt power grab by special interests and politicians." "Today's ruling is disappointing, but the choice before voters remains the same no matter when we vote: Preserve majority rule in Ohio, or dismantle it," said Dennis Willard, a spokesman for the coalition. Instead, advocates argued, amendments proposed by the Legislature must appear on the ballot during a November general election or spring primary. The group contends it's not legal because of Ohio's new voting law, which limits when August special elections can be held. The One Person One Vote coalition sued Secretary of State Frank LaRose in May and asked the court to direct LaRose to scrap the Aug. And it would eliminate a 10-day period that petitioners are granted to replace any invalid signatures. It requires citizen groups to get voter signatures from all 88 counties, instead of 44, to place an amendment on the ballot. Issue 1 would also change the signature-gathering process citizens must follow to place amendments on the ballot. If approved, the measure would require 60% of voters to enact new constitutional amendments, instead of a simple majority of 50% plus one. In a 4-3 ruling, the Republican-leaning court determined that lawmakers legally set an Aug. Ohio can proceed with an August election for voters to decide whether it should be harder to amend the state constitution, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled Friday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |